Taking Advantage of the Advisory Process – Schoolhouse Rock Style
As promised we’re going to take a trip down memory lane. Well, it’s only memory lane for those of us who are old enough to remember SchoolHouse Rock on Saturday mornings. For those of you who are not old enough, here’s a link to what I am referencing:
The last newsletter was Part 1 of explaining the CJIS Advisory Process and laid out the structure, makeup and responsibilities of the FBI CJIS Advisory Policy Board (APB). This newsletter is Part 2 where we’re going to complete the process by illustrating how an idea or request becomes policy. How you, as a contributor and user of the CJIS systems, have input into the “process.”
First and foremost, you need to have an idea or request. This idea or request needs to be transformed into a written proposal, called a “topic paper.” A topic paper is similar to a bill in congress (or “Bill” from Schoolhouse Rock) and will need to successfully make its way through the “process” using your representatives before being implemented. Keeping in line with our theme (those born prior to the 70’s will smile):
To be considered complete, topic papers should include the following:
Clear statement of the request
How the subject of the request is being handled now or a description of the problem being solved
A scenario or example that illustrates the problem/solution
Explanation of benefit(s) to the criminal justice community
Impact on state or local agencies, users and/or systems, if known
It is important that the magnitude of any problem, solution or request is explained so that, if approved, a priority can be set to implement the change.
Though the CJIS Division sends out solicitations twice a year for agenda items, topic papers for discussion at the CJIS Working Group meetings may be submitted at any time. The solicitation just lines up with the “process” and its deadlines.
Once a topic paper is created it can be submitted. Exactly how it gets submitted and the steps it follows depends on where it originates. It reminds me again of our modified Saturday morning cartoon and how “Bill” goes through Congress to eventually become a law.
If a state or local agency creates it’s own topic paper, it needs to get submitted through the CJIS Systems Officer or Agency (CSO or CSA). This allows for a review to determine any effect on state or national programs. After the CSO/CSA determination is made the topic paper if forwarded to the appropriate Working Group Chairperson and then to the CJIS Division for determination of inclusion on the next Working Group meeting agenda.
When a topic paper is created by a State Identification Bureau, they may submit it to the CSO/CSA or directly to the CJIS Division for determination of inclusion on the next Working Group meeting agenda.
When a topic paper is created by a professional organization, they may submit it directly to the CJIS Division for determination of inclusion on the next Working Group meeting agenda.
Once a topic paper is placed on the Working Group agenda each working group reviews and discusses the operational, policy and technical aspects of the proposal. If input or a recommendation from subject matter experts in a specific area is warranted, the topic paper is forwarded to the appropriate ad-hoc subcommittee. If not, Working Group recommendations are forwarded to the APB for further action.
Once the proposal has been reviewed and discussed by the APB, their recommendation is forwarded to the FBI Director.
From here, the FBI Director will review the APB recommendation(s) and either accept, modify or reject the recommendations.
Depending on the actions of the FBI Director, policy and/or program changes can be created, modified or deleted.
This is how our friend, “Topic Paper,” makes his way through the process of being created, sufficiently vetted, made into a recommendation and finally, acted upon by the FBI Director. This is, similar to how “Bill” becomes “Law,” how “Topic Paper” can become “Policy.”
If you are a visual person, I’ve include a flowchart of the process below:
I know it takes a little to digest the entire process, but it is my hope that this and the last newsletter helped to explain and illustrate the CJIS Advisory Process.
You should now be able to answer the questions, “How did they come up with this policy?” and “Why do they require this?”
Additionally, you should be more aware of the fact that, as a system contributor/user and through the shared management concept, known as the CJIS Advisory Process, you have a voice as to how policies and programs of FBI systems that benefit the criminal justice community are administered.
Until next time, be safe.